Passing Off in Trademark Law

Author: Yashashvi Mishra, 5th Year Law Student, University of Allahabad

The concept of passing off is an age-old remedy in common law that protects the goodwill of a business from misrepresentation. It is especially useful when a trademark is not registered, yet the business has acquired a reputation in the market. The underlying idea is simple: no one should represent their goods or services as those of someone else.

This doctrine plays a critical role in the Indian legal system and is recognized under Section 27 of the Trademarks Act, 1999, which clarifies that rights against passing off remain unaffected even in the absence of trademark registration.

Why Is Passing Off Important?

In today’s highly competitive market, businesses spend years building trust, customer loyalty, and a distinct identity. Even without registering a trademark, a company can earn legal protection for its brand elements through the doctrine of passing off.

This remedy becomes especially important for small or growing businesses that may not have registered their marks but have created significant goodwill. It prevents other traders from unfairly benefitting by copying names, packaging, or branding that may mislead consumers.

Essential Ingredients of Passing Off

To successfully claim relief under passing off, the following elements must be established:

1. Existence of Goodwill or Reputation
   The plaintiff must demonstrate that their business or product has built a reputation in the market. This can be through advertisements, media presence, or long-standing use of a distinctive mark.
2. Misrepresentation by the Defendant
   There should be a false representation that confuses or deceives consumers into believing that the defendant’s goods or services are linked to or originate from the plaintiff.
3. Resulting Damage or Likelihood of Damage
   Finally, the misrepresentation should result in or be likely to result in damage to the plaintiff’s goodwill, whether through loss of sales, erosion of brand value, or dilution of reputation.

Different Forms of Passing Off

Passing off can take various forms. The most common is when someone uses a similar name or logo to confuse customers. Sometimes, it may involve similar packaging, color schemes, slogans, or even website layouts. Another variant is reverse passing off, where a trader sells the plaintiff’s goods as their own, without attributing the source.

In all such cases, the focus remains on whether there is deception and if it affects the reputation and business of the original owner.

Notable Indian Case on Passing Off

Several Indian judgments have shaped and reinforced the doctrine of passing off:

• In Cadilla Healthcare Ltd. v. Cadilla Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (2001), the Court emphasized the importance of protecting consumers from confusion, especially in the pharmaceutical industry.
• Britannia Industries Ltd v. ITC Ltd (2017), in this case, ITC sued Britannia for infringing the trade dress of its “Sunfeast Farmlite All Good” biscuits, claiming a proprietary color combination used in packaging. The court held that colors or color combinations alone are not inherently distinctive like trademarks. Without a strong association built over time, one cannot claim exclusive rights over packaging colours. ITC’s claim was dismissed—Britannia’s packaging did not amount to passing off.
• Nirma Ltd v. Nimma International & Anr. (2010), here, Nirma, owner of the well‑known “Nirma” trademark, sued Nimma International for using marks like “Nimma International” and “Nimson’s Nima Care” in cosmetics. The court found that “Nimson’s Nima Care” was phonically and semantically distinct, sold via different channels, and thus not confusing. However, “Nimma International” was deceptively similar to “Nirma,” especially given Nirma’s strong, long‑established reputation. Nimma was restrained from using “Nimma” but not from using “Nimson.”

It collectively highlights that courts prioritize genuine reputation and consumer protection over mere procedural rights like trademark registration.

Remedies Available in Passing Off

If a court is convinced that a passing off has occurred, several remedies may be granted:

• Injunctions to stop the infringing activity
• Damages to compensate for losses suffered
• Accounts of profits, where the infringer may have to hand over profits made from the wrongful use
• Delivery/destruction of infringing goods
• These remedies aim to restore the harmed party’s rights and discourage unethical practices.

Difference Between Passing Off and Infringement

Though often confused, passing off and trademark infringement differ significantly.

In infringement cases, the trademark must be registered, and the plaintiff needs to prove unauthorized use. In passing off, registration is not required—the focus lies on reputation, deception, and damage. In many situations, both remedies may be claimed together, depending on the circumstances.

How to Protect Your Brand Without Registration

If your business has not registered its trademark, here are a few tips to protect yourself through the law of passing off:

• Maintain consistent use of your branding (name, logo, slogan)
• Keep records of when and how you started using them
• Document advertising, customer feedback, and sales to show market presence
• Take immediate action (like legal notices) if someone imitates your brand

Although registration is strongly recommended, the passing off remedy offers vital support when you rely solely on reputation.

Conclusion

Passing off serves as a safeguard for businesses that have built trust and identity in the market, even without formal registration. It reflects the legal system's recognition of fairness, consumer rights, and ethical competition. With the rise of digital branding and online commerce, the doctrine of passing off continues to evolve, making it essential for businesses to be vigilant and well-informed.

To update yourself with LegalNews, visit legalwiki.co